Winner

I've never been very competitive when it comes to sports. I don't think this is much of a surprise, considering how unathletic I am. With other things, I sometimes feel a sense of competition, because I think I have a chance at winning. But with sports, there is no chance, and thus, no need for me to try. It sounds very sad, but my life is actually a lot simpler this way.

However, even though I have never won anything sports related in my life, I'm happy to say that I have played a critical role in another athlete's victory. It was the year 2009, and I was volunteering for the Rhode Island Paralympics.

Now if you do the math, you'll realize that in 2009, I was 11 years old. There's not much that an 11 year old can do at functions like the Paralympics. I tried asking around for advice, but no one seemed to take me very seriously. I was told to just wait around and help out when I saw an opportunity. However, in the end, I felt rather useless, not to mention that my volunteer t-shirt was two sizes too big for me and went down to my knees. 

Nonetheless, I tried my best. My official name tag gave me courage, and I felt an immense sense of duty to serve. I looked everywhere for a way to contribute, flashing my lanyard, but there seemed to be no work for me. At most, I passed out a couple of information packets to some spectators who were too weak to say no to a ten year old kid.

Finally, after moping around for an hour, I found an unexciting, but legitimate job: escorting contestants into an arena. To be honest, I wasn't allowed to enter the waiting tent at first, because some of the older volunteers were skeptical of my abilities. But the thing was, I was somewhat tall for my age, and I had a good poker face. I realized that as long as it looked like I was doing something important, no one would really question me. 

So for most of the day, I continued guiding athletes to the arena, finally doing something valuable. 

Nonetheless, I faced the problem that afflicts nearly every 40 year old in America: I was dissatisfied in my work.

There wasn't any sense of accomplishment. My job ended when the athletes got to the arena and I returned to my tent. As the day dragged on, I started losing hope of ever doing anything meaningful.

Little did I know that my shining moment was soon to come with one single event: the wheelchair race.

One of the athletes needed someone to push them into the starting position at the arena. They must have been short on older volunteers, because they appointed me to the job. However, I was also strictly told to come right back to the tent once I was done. Completely overwhelmed with the opportunity to finally enter the arena, I happily obliged.

As I pushed my athlete in, I realized that she was unable to speak, and seemed rather confused by what was going on around her. Nonetheless, she seemed happy, and in my heart, I silently cheered her on. I rolled her into the starting position, took a long look around the arena, and then started my sad walk back to the tent.

Suddenly, one of the managers stopped me. Apparently the wheelchair race, as a precaution, required that one volunteer wait for each contestant at the finish line. Since I was the one who rolled her in, he assumed that I would also be the one to fill in this task. Immediately, my orders to "return to the tent immediately" flew out of my head. The crowd was cheering as the race was about to begin, and I saw my chance to serve my duty flash before my eyes. 

Putting on my best "I-know-what-I'm-doing" poker face, I nodded and took my place.

Now you would think that someone would have noticed an 11 year old girl among the rest of the significantly older volunteers, but it's surprising what kind of things slip one's mind in the heat of the moment. In fact, just as the race was about to begin, the volunteer right next to me finally realized that something wasn't right.

But it was too late. I was already in the zone.

As the race started, I was on hyper alert. I knew that the chances of me actually doing anything were very slim. It was a short distance, so it would take the contestants at most a minute to finish. Regardless, I watched my athlete diligently, looking for any opportunity for me to do something.

The race began without a hitch. The contestants were coming towards the finish line fast, and we cheered them on as they drew closer. In a matter of seconds, they were almost finished, and it seemed like I would once again serve little purpose. 

But suddenly, I noticed something. My contestant was rolling completely perpendicular to the intended route of travel.

In a panic, the head organizer yelled out that one of us needed to help put her back on the track. And at that moment, I felt immense power course through my veins.

I ran out onto the track to direct her back to the path. But by then, I had lost all logical sense, and wasn't really sure what I was supposed to be doing anymore. Before I knew it, I was pushing her at lightning speed past all the other racers, who gawked at me incredulously.

She looked very confused when we crossed the finish line, but happy nonetheless.

Needless to say, I was soon caught and thrown out of the arena for good. I did boring, mindless tasks for the rest of the day. But I'll never forget the brief glance I had of my racer on the podium, in first place, gleefully waving to the crowd. Some kind of connection flowed between us. And that was the only moment I've come close to winning an athletic competition. 

THE END

How To Be A Poet

During my time in college, I've started to write a lot of poetry. I can't help it-- whenever I start to feel any kind of emotion, I need to write it down, and before I know it I've zoned out through half a lecture and written some derpy poems again. Right now, my poems' primary purpose is to help me journal my thoughts rather than be of any artistic value, so they're usually awkward and clunky. But the process serves me well, and sometimes, people even think that I'm doing serious note-taking.

But of course, this often leads me to be dissatisfied with the quality of my poems. Sometimes, I wish I knew more about the art of the craft, so that I could write work with real substance. After all, I can't rely on pent up emotion forever. I need a sustainable source of inspiration and thought.

But poetry is hard. In one of my classes, I've had to opportunity to read some modern poems, and I don't even know what I'm reading half of the time. I try to look for some deeper meanings in them, but instead, I just get really confused.  I think it only goes to show the extent of my ignorance.

It's disheartening at times.
But in my defense, with lines like:

"I lovely lady lumps
your lumps as lovely",

what am I possibly supposed to extract? Poor grammar? Uncreative word choice? Possibly even plagiarism, from Fergie? There are times when I can appreciate a little mystery in poetry, but these kinds of things are not mysterious-- they're just weird. I often wonder how certain pieces make it through editing and publishing. There must have been some interesting deliberation behind the scenes.

Maybe the goal is to make the reader as confused as possible. After all, we are most susceptible to new ideas and influence in moments of confusion and weakness. In fact, it seems like a pretty smart move. I'll keep it in mind for the future.

I've also noticed that my name isn't cool enough for me to be a poet. All of the most accomplished, reputed masters have names that sound like poetry themselves. Honestly, who has a last name like "Frost" these days? And what kind of parents would you need to get a name like "William Carlos Williams"? These people got a lucky draw, in my opinion. In my case, there is no such happy coincidence. If anything, my initials are just one letter away from being "KFC". 

But maybe that could be my pen name. I think "Kathy Chicken" sounds kind of legitimate. I could write some pretty good poems about farm life with it, and then I would be famous, and people would marvel at how coincidental it all is. (Like writing about snowy evenings, with a last name like Frost. Dang you, Frost!)

Lastly, I think I don't experiment enough. My poems all align to the margin, follow pretty set rules of rhythm, and stick with a central idea. But look at the beautiful work of e. e. cummings (another cool name guy), or Gertrude Stein. These people are real masters. Who else could think to write an entire poem misspelling the word "grasshopper", or come up with a line like, "Sugar is not a vegetable"? These concepts are simply beyond my capabilities. Perhaps for this reason alone, I could never become a world famous poet.

But for now, I will still try. So far, I've established that my poetry isn't confusing enough, and that I need a cooler name, and that I need to get really funky with my format and wording. So here's my best try. I've worked pretty hard on this, but it's still not perfect, so I'd appreciate it if you all gave me some feedback. Here it goes:

Deep, Fried.
by Kathy Flora Chicken

Chicken.
chicken-- fried?
          Fry: to fly.
to fly the chicken.
Wherefore do I
                    F     R     Y    THECHICKEN?
It must be golden,
for licken'.
And if not: chikiecn
To where
                    "ba-gok"
must I-
find                the              C:hi:ck:en?
Ohlisten.
D o y o u h e a r t h e 
THE
thehhe--

sqUAwk
in.

I think it's the start of a beautiful career. Let me know what you think!

______________________________________________
But in all seriousness, I don't mean to disregard the incredible work that poets do, classic or modern. In fact, a lot of the writers I've made fun of in this post have written some of my favorite poems. I highly recommend them to those looking for some interesting work to read!

The Truth About Short Hair

A lot of the girls I've talked to think short hair is awesome. It's clean, it's chic. It gives off an air of elegance, grace, and maybe even maturity that doesn't come as easily with longer locks. Plus, it's super easy to manage, so you can even save on shampoo!

However, these notions are false. Short hair is nothing but an illusion. Today, my goal is to bring forth several terrifying issues to light, which remain veritably unknown to those who have never had short hair. Behold, the truth about this phenomenon, disclosed in public for the first time.

Myth #1: short hair is neater than long hair.
A lot of people first chop off all their locks thinking that short hair is tidier, doesn't need as much brushing, and can save them a lot of time in the long run. I know when I first got short hair, that's what I was expecting. However, this cannot be further from the truth.

Let's talk physics for a bit. When you have longer hair, it has a greater mass. Weight = (mass)(force of gravity), which is relatively constant in the downward direction. Thus, as you can see, having long hair automatically encourages your locks to fall towards the ground-- that is, the direction it's supposed to be in. However, when you reduce the mass of your hair, this downward pull is absent. There is no longer a force encouraging your hair to go the way it should. Instead, you end up with things like this:

When this unfortunate event occurs, the only solutions are to artificially weigh your hair down with water (which is pretty bad for its volume and consistency), or to wear accessories like your life depends on it. Sometimes, you simply have to take a full shower to bring your hair back down to base level.

However, it is also important to note that it is simply impossible to sleep with wet, or even slightly damp, short hair. That's a horror story on a different level altogether.

Myth #2: short hair doesn't need much care to look presentable.
Another point related to the "tidiness" of short hair is its supposed ease of care. This notion is also completely false, and almost entirely for a single reason: one cannot competently put short hair in a pony tail. It simply isn't done.

Before my hair was the length it is now (still pretty short, but by no means how short it was before), I simply accepted bad hair days as a fact of life. In high school, if you woke up at 6:45AM with a ridiculous cow lick in your hair and had to be out the door in 15 minutes, there was no way to salvage your appearance. You simply walked with your head held high, hoped that gravity would do its job, and forgot about it during the day. 

However, once my hair started growing somewhat longer, I discovered a neat trick, known and beloved by every long-haired person since the beginning of time: ponytails.

How versatile. How easy. How glorious! With the right clothes, a ponytail can even make it seem like you put more effort into your hair that day-- what a wonder.

But when you have short hair and you try to fashion a ponytail, the results simply aren't the same. The few times that I wore a pony tail with short hair, I didn't feel glorious at all-- I simply felt like a samurai.

And finally...
Myth #3: Short hair makes you look more mature.
Ah yes, the vaguest myth of all. I'll give some credit to this one: oftentimes, having a shorter cut does indeed make you look a bit older. If you manage to avoid all the horrors listed above, it can definitely bring about a certain elegance to your look.

But maybe I just have a bad history with short hair. For me, short hair does not make me feel older. Ironically, a horrible short hair cut that I got last year was almost exactly the same as my hair when I was six-- that is, it was the infamous Asian bowl cut. Thus, when I had short hair, instead of feeling older, I rather found myself questioning if I'd aged at all in the past 11 years.

Thus concludes my startling report. Perhaps now when you see a person walking down the street rocking a beautiful pixie cut, you can recognize their efforts. Give them a high five. Buy them an ice cream or something, because a beautiful, well-groomed short hair cut is not an easy feat to manage-- literally.

Snoozy Review: Pride and Prejudice

Yahoo! Pretty much everyone knows that, as a horrible romantic, Pride and Prejudice is one of my favorite classics of all time. So I guess this review is going to be pretty biased... But deep down, everyone appreciates a good love story, right? Read below for more! 

Review: Pride and Prejudice

Jane Austen, 1813

Plot: 
Elizabeth Bennett is one of five daughters in a middle class family. As such, she is constantly being urged to marry for money-- something she considers an abomination to true love. Thus, when she meets the fabulously rich Mr. Darcy, Elizabeth has a lot of doubts about him. Darcy himself has developed some personality issues from being so rich his whole life. From their first meeting, it's evident that they don't get along well.

But Elizabeth's sister ends up falling for Darcy's best friend, and chance brings them together again and again. Will Darcy and Elizabeth ever be able to reconcile their pride and prejudices against each other?? (spoiler alert: yes)

By The Cover:

I accidentally own three copies of this book... 
But anyway, each cover is lovely, and offers its own take on the book's elegant, yet playful tone!

First Line: 

"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife."
So iconic! It's pretty much the driving force of the whole story. 

Last Line: 

Darcy, as well as Elizabeth, really loved them; and they were both ever sensible of the warmest gratitude towards the persons who, by bringing her into Derbyshire, had been the means of uniting them."
To be honest, this isn't one of my favorite last lines. It's not terribly compelling at all, given all the stuff that happens in the last few chapters. But I like this book so much that it doesn't really bother me anymore.

 A Quote:

"I cannot fix on the hour, or the spot, or the look, or the words, which laid the foundation. It is too long ago. I was in the middle before I knew that I had begun."

*sighs*

Favorite Part:

When Elizabeth destroys Darcy.

Least Favorite Part:

Some of the ball/party scenes can be long, monotonous, and frankly confusing. Perhaps some may take them differently, but those were definitely hard to get through sometimes.

Final Comments:

I like to think that I'm a huge Jane Austen fan, but maybe I just really like Pride and Prejudice. It's such a fabulous read! I love the characters, their relationships, and how evidently they grow as the book progresses. I love the social commentary on class, family dynamics, and the role of women. And of course, I love the happy ending. If Pride and Prejudice has been on your list of books to read for a while, but just never got around to it, this is your cue-- give it a try!

Rating: 4.5/5

Why I Can't Watch Horror Movies

It's not an unknown fact that I'm very scared of horror movies. Some people can sit through them, enjoy them, and even think some of their attempts to "scare" you are funny. Not me. I just sit there and prepare to die.

The fact is, horror movies scare you on an entirely different level than other things. For example, when your friend jumps at you from behind a corner, you're extremely frightened for one second, but afterwards, you just want to punch someone in the face. But horror movies can scare you just as badly-- and then continue to do so for weeks. That's why I consider horror movies the scariest thing on the planet: because they have fear in both intensity and duration. 

Now, I used to always just take this fear of mine as a fact. Lots of people don't enjoy scary movies, and I was just one of the many. But looking back, I've started to think that maybe my extreme fear of horror movies comes from a scarred past. Perhaps I am still put- off by the one time I allowed myself to experience the horror genre-- and the startling revelation that followed. 

It was several years ago, on a crisp fall day. My mom and I were talking about scary movies. The thing is, my mom loves them-- she went through a whole phase where she watched every notable horror movie on the planet. As such, we eventually got on the topic of Psycho, the famous thriller by Alfred Hitchcock. I had never seen it, and didn't plan to. But for some reason, I was still curious about it-- so I asked her to explain the plot to me.

As many people who get easily scared would know, sometimes not seeing is even scarier than seeing itself. Looking back, I really should have changed the subject. But the thing was, as she was explaining it to me, I didn't feel that scared. In fact, I felt compelled to listen, and even, for a brief moment in my life, understood why some people might consider watching horror movies to be "fun." We ended to conversation on a fine note, and I proceeded to go about my day as usual.

Later that night, I practically sobbed my way through my entire shower praying someone wasn't waiting behind the curtain to stab me to death.

But even from this obvious example, I hadn't fully understood the truth. I simply thought that I was scared of horror movies. The only thing I had to do was stay away from them, and I would be fine.

Just a few days later, I got home from school and decided to watch some TV. At the time, one of my favorite shows concerned a group of intense fishermen who dedicated their lives to catching crabs. Looking back on it, it was a strange premise for a show, but at the time, it seemed rather natural.

But when I turned to the normal channel, I was not greeted by my beloved fishermen. Instead, the show had just finished, and another show was previewing: it was called "A Haunting."

Immediately, my logical mind began running. I had just scared myself silly a few days ago. I had discovered that I disliked horror. Now, there was a horror TV show in front of me. As such, my conclusion was very simple.

I continued watching.

Something was strange. Even though I knew I would definitely regret this choice for the rest of my life, I had no desire to avoid the imminent disaster in front of me. I sat through all the commercials. Then I sat through the opening sequence. And before I knew it, I was watching the documentary by my own will. 

The episode started off innocently enough. It took place in a comfortable suburban neighborhood, much like mine. There was a normal family, much like mine. There was a nice, yellow house, much like mine. Then all of a sudden, people started getting possessed and cups started flying all over the kitchen-- much unlike mine. 

Soon enough, I snapped out of my trance. I was scared-- very scared. There was no more curiosity, no more piqued interest. If I wanted to sleep that night, I had to turn off the TV immediately. But at that moment, I realized something even scarier: I couldn't move. I was literally so paralyzed with fear that I couldn't get close enough to the screen to turn it off.

So there I sat, in utter fear, until the whole episode finished. 45 minutes and several gory scenes later, I crawled back into my room, a hollow shell of my former self.

At this point, I finally resolved to never watch anything horror related again. There was no more lingering confidence, no more second chances. Something weird happened to me whenever I was exposed to the genre, and I was not like myself. It was best to avoid it entirely.

But of course, I still had no problem watching TV. A few days later, I eagerly turned on the TV, awaiting my heroic crab fishers.

Instead, "A Haunting" was playing again.

Again, I could feel something strange drawing me in. Again, I felt like convincing myself that the last times were no big deal, that I could handle it, that all I needed was one more try... But I snapped out of it. I screamed and ran out of the room, pleading my very confused brother to turn off the TV in my stead.

I had finally realized the truth: my relationship to horror films is like that of a moth and a flame. I know they're horrible for me, and I take no delight in their aftermath, but for some reason, once I'm exposed to them, I become incredibly curious and eager to watch. Thus, my only solution is to avoid them entirely, and thus, safe myself from a life of fear.

And that's why I can't watch horror movies.

THE END

Traveling

To my beloved readers,

Thank you for keeping up with my blog! The Snoozy Cat will be on standby during my travels, which will be from now until August 17th. When I return, I will try my best to fit in one more post before the next big chapter of my life-- my first day of college! 

I have started a post already, which I estimate will be finished within a week or so of my return. So stay tuned, and as always, happy reading!

Your grateful cat enthusiast,
Kathy

Snoozy Review: A Farewell To Arms

Do you like books about wars? Do you like books that provide almost no extravagant detail? Do you like books with conclusive yet somewhat unsatisfying endings? Then you should probably read something by Ernest Hemingway! Today we cover one of Hemingway's most acclaimed novels, A Farewell to Arms. It's pretty much all of the things I mentioned above, plus a little more. More information below!

Review: A Farewell to Arms

Author and Year:

Ernest Hemingway, 1929

Plot: 
A Farewell to Arms follows "Tenente" Henry, an American lieutenant serving in Italy during World War I. After being injured on the front, he meets a nurse named Catherine Barkley, and eventually falls in love with her. The novel chronicles the struggles and joys of their relationship, as well as Henry's growing desire to drop out of the war altogether.

By The Cover:

I actually read A Farewell to Arms out of a collection of books by Hemingway, so the picture above isn't the real cover. In fact, I would've chosen something less nature-y for a collection of his works (three of the four novels included are about wars, and they decide on mountains??). But the color scheme was well selected, I'll give them that!

First Line: 

"In the late summer of that year we lived in a house in a village that looked across the river and the plain to the mountains."
This line pretty much has nothing to do with the book. I do not even know why the book starts this way.

Last Line: 

"After a while I went out and left the hospital and walked back to the hotel in the rain."
So atmospheric. So emotional. So good. Bah.

A Quote:
Let me just begin by saying that there are so, so, sooo many good quotes in this novel. That's the way Hemingway's style works-- it's so sparse that the already good lines become even more powerful and resonant. Here are some of my favorites:

"When you love, you wish to do things for. You wish to sacrifice for. You wish to serve."

 "'It's all nonsense. It's only nonsense. I'm not afraid of the rain. I'm not afraid of the rain. Oh, oh, God I wish I wasn't.' She was crying. I comforted her and she stopped crying. But outside it kept raining."

"But we were never lonely and never afraid when we were together. I know the night is not the same as the day: that all things are different, that the things of the night cannot be explained in the day, because they do not then exist, and the night can be a dreadful time for lonely people once their loneliness has started. But with Catherine there was almost no difference in the night except that it was an even better time."

Darn, these quotes. You gotta read that last one again, really.

Favorite Part:

Okay, I am totally awful, but I really enjoyed the latter half of the book more than the beginning, even though it was (highlight for spoiler: a tragic ending). Henry and Catherine's relationship became so much deeper, and everything felt surprisingly solid for a Hemingway novel.

Least Favorite Part:

Do you even have to ask?

Final Comments:

A Farewell to Arms was a mixed feeling read for me. The beginning seemed to stop and go for a while, but once things began to pick up (which was conveniently after school ended), I couldn't put it down. I love how my perception of the characters changed as the book progressed, as well their occasional honest, pent up confessions of emotion. Again, if you're a fan of Hemingway''s "undercurrent" style, you'll like this book! On the other hand, if you'd like to try something of his for the first time, I might start with something else, such as The Sun Also Rises. But make sure to come back to A Farewell to Arms! It isn't strong from beginning to end, but the end is really something worth reading, I mean it.

Rating: 3/5